lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAPXgP12hvveG8y31Q77BQAzrdaeaux=Eoonu8RinGmP3DfTsbQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Thu, 20 Oct 2011 18:16:04 +0200
From:	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>
To:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>, axboe@...nel.dk,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, ctalbott@...gle.com, rni@...gle.com,
	containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 02/10] block: fix genhd refcounting in blkio_policy_parse_and_set()

On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 18:11, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org> wrote:
> I think this is essentially a bug.  If you have something like "dev =
> find_and_get(); put(dev); return dev != NULL;", it's a pretty good
> indication something is pretty screwed there, so unless someone
> screams really loud, I think I'm gonna push for removal of the
> feature.

Matching on unpredictable dev_t inside the kernel or in userspace is a
serious bug. We can't do anything like that ever on a modern system,
these times are long over.

Yes, please get rid of this misguided logic, nobody should get the
impression that this can ever work.

Kay
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ