[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <5C4C569E8A4B9B42A84A977CF070A35B2C5756688D@USINDEVS01.corp.hds.com>
Date: Thu, 20 Oct 2011 11:13:26 -0400
From: Seiji Aguchi <seiji.aguchi@....com>
To: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"Chen, Gong" <gong.chen@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>,
"len.brown@...el.com" <len.brown@...el.com>,
"ying.huang@...el.com" <ying.huang@...el.com>,
"ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
"hughd@...omium.org" <hughd@...omium.org>,
"mingo@...e.hu" <mingo@...e.hu>,
"jmorris@...ei.org" <jmorris@...ei.org>,
"a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl" <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
"namhyung@...il.com" <namhyung@...il.com>,
"dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net"
<dle-develop@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
Subject: RE: [RFC][PATCH -next] make pstore/kmsg_dump run after stopping
other cpus in panic path
Don,
>That is part of the wider problem with kmsg_dump that Vivek talks about
>with me, is that it is just a giant hook in the panic path with limited
>auditing. So we need to explicit set our expectations with BUG_ONs/WARNs
>otherwise we might get bit later by them.
I found an issue while developing a patch v2.
We can't call BUG_ON(in_nmi() && reason != KMSG_DUMP_PANIC)
because kmsg_dump(KMSG_DUMP_EMERG) is called in NMI context if "panic" kernel parameter is set.
I will keep doing research bust_spinlock() or vprintk() so that lockdep checking works and we can avoid any deadlocks.
Seiji
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists