[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <m2wrc0xpbg.fsf@firstfloor.org>
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2011 21:24:51 -0700
From: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>
To: Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Suresh Siddha <suresh.b.siddha@...el.com>,
Venki Pallipadi <venki@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch] Idle balancer: cache align nohz structure to improve idle load balancing scalability
Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com> writes:
> */
> static struct {
> - atomic_t load_balancer;
> - atomic_t first_pick_cpu;
> - atomic_t second_pick_cpu;
> - cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask;
> + atomic_t load_balancer ____cacheline_aligned;
> + atomic_t first_pick_cpu ____cacheline_aligned;
> + atomic_t second_pick_cpu ____cacheline_aligned;
> + cpumask_var_t idle_cpus_mask ____cacheline_aligned;
On large configs idle_cpu_masks may be allocated. May need
more changes to tell the allocator to cache align/pad too?
-Andi
--
ak@...ux.intel.com -- Speaking for myself only
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists