[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111021123041.GE4080@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Oct 2011 13:30:41 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] pinctrl: add a generic control interface
On Fri, Oct 21, 2011 at 02:28:25PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 5:42 PM, Mark Brown
> > On Thu, Oct 20, 2011 at 04:43:30PM +0200, Linus Walleij wrote:
> >> In Ux500 we model our power domain switches as regulators,
> >> does such a property even belong in pin control? Is there
> >> one power domain switch per pin you mean, or a power switch
> >> for a whole group of pins?
> > This isn't an on/off control and in this cae it's per pin.
> If this is a binary output pin, I suspect that
> I suspect that what you call "off" is actually implemeted as
> in this figure:
To repeat once more: this is *not* an on/off control, this is a control
selecting the voltage domain a pin is referenced to.
> http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/c0/Tristate_buffer.svg
No, this is completely orthogonal to voltage domain selection.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists