[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHkRjk6kJmc7+MDGvyDqhVTBefPzjm-_XdrC85kpZozuYEb=YA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:49:41 +0200
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 08/16] ARM: LPAE: Page table maintenance for the
3-level format
On 23 October 2011 13:56, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 04:03:31PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>> This patch modifies the pgd/pmd/pte manipulation functions to support
>> the 3-level page table format. Since there is no need for an 'ext'
>> argument to cpu_set_pte_ext(), this patch conditionally defines a
>> different prototype for this function when CONFIG_ARM_LPAE.
>
> This has a really large number of ifdefs. You've split the 2 and 3
> level page table stuff into two different header files already,
> conditionalized on CONFIG_ARM_LPAE, yet we still end up with lots of
> junk in the common header file conditionalized on that symbol. Can't
> we find a way to restructure pgtable.h to sort this out more cleanly?
I'll look into this.
> Do we really need to change the set_pte_ext() prototype as well - do
> we _really_ need ifdefs around its declaration, and every usage of it
> as well? Can't we just leave the 3rd argument as zero?
The LPAE variant of cpu_v7_set_pte_ext takes the second argument as a
64-bit value:
r0 - ptep
r2, r3 - pteval
If we pass a third argument, that would go on the stack.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists