[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111102170230.GJ29782@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 17:02:30 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 11/16] ARM: LPAE: Add fault handling support
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:57:56PM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 10, 2011 at 04:03:34PM +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > @@ -494,6 +508,72 @@ static struct fsr_info {
> > int code;
> > const char *name;
> > } fsr_info[] = {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_LPAE
...
> > +#else /* !CONFIG_ARM_LPAE */
> > /*
> > * The following are the standard ARMv3 and ARMv4 aborts. ARMv5
> > * defines these to be "precise" aborts.
> > @@ -535,6 +615,7 @@ static struct fsr_info {
> > { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 29" },
> > { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 30" },
> > { do_bad, SIGBUS, 0, "unknown 31" }
> > +#endif /* CONFIG_ARM_LPAE */
>
> Can't we do better than this?
The first thought was defining the fsr_info array in a different file
but that would mean exposing functions from the fault.c which are
currently defined as static.
The other variant is including a C file directly in fault.c. It's not
very nice but at least we remove the big #ifdef.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists