[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111023163042.4a93936c@xenia.leun.net>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 16:30:42 +0200
From: Michael Leun <ml@...ton.leun.net>
To: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Bisected: Massive memory leak in dm-snapshot in 3.1 development
introduced
On Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:44:49 +0100
Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:52:06PM +0300, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > Mikulas, Alasdair? I see the mempool_free() for the "master job",
> > what about everything else? Does the dm_kcopyd_prepare_callback()
> > perhaps need to do a
> >
> > job->master_job = job;
> >
> > or similar?
>
> If you look at the other place that performs that mempool_alloc, it's
> indeed present there.
>
> Michael - can you test if this solves the problem?
>
> Alasdair
>
> --- a/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
> @@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ void *dm_kcopyd_prepare_callback(struct
> dm_kcopyd_client *kc, job->kc = kc;
> job->fn = fn;
> job->context = context;
> + job->master_job = job;
>
> atomic_inc(&kc->nr_jobs);
>
>
Yup, it indeed does.
--
MfG,
Michael Leun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists