[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111023134449.GA13703@agk-dp.fab.redhat.com>
Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 14:44:49 +0100
From: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michael Leun <ml@...ton.leun.net>
Cc: Alasdair G Kergon <agk@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, dm-devel@...hat.com,
Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Bisected: Massive memory leak in dm-snapshot in 3.1
development introduced
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:52:06PM +0300, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> Mikulas, Alasdair? I see the mempool_free() for the "master job", what
> about everything else? Does the dm_kcopyd_prepare_callback() perhaps
> need to do a
>
> job->master_job = job;
>
> or similar?
If you look at the other place that performs that mempool_alloc, it's indeed
present there.
Michael - can you test if this solves the problem?
Alasdair
--- a/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
+++ b/drivers/md/dm-kcopyd.c
@@ -628,6 +628,7 @@ void *dm_kcopyd_prepare_callback(struct dm_kcopyd_client *kc,
job->kc = kc;
job->fn = fn;
job->context = context;
+ job->master_job = job;
atomic_inc(&kc->nr_jobs);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists