[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024120718.GD2273@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:07:18 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
patches@...aro.org, "Paul E. McKenney" <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 36/55] rcu: Prevent early boot
set_need_resched() from __rcu_pending()
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 06:49:15PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:00:30AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > From: Paul E. McKenney <paul.mckenney@...aro.org>
> >
> > There isn't a whole lot of point in poking the scheduler before there
> > are other tasks to switch to. This commit therefore adds a check
> > for rcu_scheduler_fully_active in __rcu_pending() to suppress any
> > pre-scheduler calls to set_need_resched(). The downside of this approach
> > is additional runtime overhead in a reasonably hot code path.
>
> If you're concerned about the runtime overhead, this does seem like a
> perfect candidate for jump labels.
I have added this to my todo list, but would welcome a patch.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists