[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111024121048.GE2273@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2011 05:10:48 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Josh Triplett <josh@...htriplett.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...ymtl.ca, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org, Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu,
dhowells@...hat.com, eric.dumazet@...il.com, darren@...art.com,
patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH tip/core/rcu 42/55] rcu: Make rcu_torture_fqs() exit
loops at end of test
On Sun, Oct 16, 2011 at 06:53:29PM -0700, Josh Triplett wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 06, 2011 at 11:00:36AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > The rcu_torture_fqs() function can prevent the rcutorture tests from
> > completing, resulting in a hang. This commit therefore ensures that
> > rcu_torture_fqs() will exit its inner loops at the end of the test,
> > and also applies the newish ULONG_CMP_LT() macro to time comparisons.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
>
> This seems like two entirely separate changes, which should go in
> separate commits.
Interesting. I was thinking of this as fixing hangs in rcutorture,
and was feeling somewhat bad about having the separate commit for the
part of the fix that I missed. ;-)
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists