linux-kernel - Re: [RESEND] [RFC][PATCH X86_32 1/2]: Call do_notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111025161426.GC17067@redhat.com>
Date:	Tue, 25 Oct 2011 18:14:26 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
	Ananth N Mavinakayanahalli <ananth@...ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Jim Keniston <jkenisto@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Roland McGrath <roland@...k.frob.com>,
	Shuah Khan <shuah.khan@...com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
	Alexander van Heukelum <heukelum@...tmail.fm>,
	Russell King <rmk@....linux.org.uk>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RESEND] [RFC][PATCH X86_32 1/2]: Call do_notify_resume() with
	interrupts enabled

On 10/25, Srikar Dronamraju wrote:
>
> do_notify_resume() gets called with interrupts disabled on x86_32. This
> is different from the x86_64 behavior, where interrupts are enabled at
> the time.

And note that do_notify_resume() paths assume that irqs are enabled.
key_replace_session_keyring/get_signal_to_deliver start with _lock_irq.

IOW, I vote for this change even if I can't ack it (although it looks
"obviously correct" to me). In fact refrigerator() looks buggy without
this change. Yes, it enables irqs but only "by accident", via unlock_irq().
And we are going to remove this recalc_sigpending() from freezer.


> Queries on lkml on this issue hasn't yielded any clear answer. Lets make
> x86_32 behave the same as x86_64, unless there is a real reason to
> maintain status quo.
> 
> Please refer https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/9/27/130 for more details
> 
> A similar change was suggested in arm
> 	https://lkml.org/lkml/2011/8/25/231
> 
> My 32-bit machine works fine (tm) with the patch below
> 
> Signed-off-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
>  arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S |    4 ++++
>  1 files changed, 4 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> index f3f6f53..22d0e21 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/entry_32.S
> @@ -625,6 +625,8 @@ work_notifysig:				# deal with pending signals and
>  	movl %esp, %eax
>  	jne work_notifysig_v86		# returning to kernel-space or
>  					# vm86-space
> +	TRACE_IRQS_ON
> +	ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
>  	xorl %edx, %edx
>  	call do_notify_resume
>  	jmp resume_userspace_sig
> @@ -638,6 +640,8 @@ work_notifysig:				# deal with pending signals and
>  #else
>  	movl %esp, %eax
>  #endif
> +	TRACE_IRQS_ON
> +	ENABLE_INTERRUPTS(CLBR_NONE)
>  	xorl %edx, %edx
>  	call do_notify_resume
>  	jmp resume_userspace_sig
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/