[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111025205106.GD7234@suse.de>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:51:06 +0200
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Cc: Greg KH <greg@...ah.com>, Nhan H Mai <nhan.h.mai@...el.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-serial@...r.kernel.org,
alan@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] serial/8250_pci: add a quirk for the kt serial controller
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 01:16:34PM -0700, Dan Williams wrote:
> From: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
> Date: Sun, 23 Oct 2011 15:06:24 -0700
> Subject: [PATCH v2] serial/8250_pci: add a quirk for the kt serial controller
>
> Workaround dropped notifications in the iir register. Prevent reads
> coincident with new interrupt notifications by reading the iir at most
> once per interrupt.
>
> Reported-by: Nhan H Mai <nhan.h.mai@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>
Much better.
But.
Do you really think I can apply a patch that looks like this above? I
have to edit the text of the email before I apply it.
Now I'm a bit grumpy about this at the moment as Linus yelled at me for
patches where I missed this on a few for the 3.2 merge window, so I'm
going to push back on people now very hard.
Please send this in a format that I can run 'git am' on the email you
send me. I could not do that here, otherwise we would end up with a
duplicate header in the changelog message.
Yes, it makes you do a bit more work, but when you are handling
thousands of patches like me, you scale better than I do :)
Actually, it's just making you do it properly, along with everyone else,
which is a good thing, right?
thanks,
greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists