[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFyRpjKrjOkiwUDKb_madynN71neUzCjNVt-TPzsRbEcOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 09:25:29 +0200
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Cc: V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p changes fro merge window
On Mon, Oct 24, 2011 at 6:28 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com> wrote:
>
> are available in the git repository at:
> git://github.com/ericvh/linux.git for-next
So for the merge window, I *really* want the development trees I pull
from explicitly verified some way.
Now, the p9 patches seem to be small enough, and not core enough, for
me to care deeply, but I really *really* want to not see unsigned
github things.
Putting a signed tag on there somewhere that actually signs the top
commit *and* mentions the repository and branch it is on (ie github)
kis not wonderfully convenient, but it's at least relatively
straightforward (do I have a gpg key I can trust?).
Or using a host that I can trust is being maintained by you guys (or
some trusted third party like kernel.org).
(Also, I'm only seeing about half the patches mentioned in linux-next. Hmm?)
Please? Not pulled.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists