[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLGQmK7PvdMaKu9ezPDmeHPaKMCSb5izK5p5tTatmLbptg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:00:13 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p changes fro merge window
Hi Eric,
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 3:48 PM, Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com> wrote:
> What's the preferred maintainer workflow? I had been fetching and then rebasing, which
> seemed to keep my shortlog clean of merge commits and the outstanding patches
> towards the top. Should I just be pulling from upstream and not caring about the merge
> commits?
I don't know if mine is the preferred workflow but what I usually do is:
1. Send a pull request to Linus in a separate throw-away branch
that's an exact copy of my "next" branch.
2. Wait until -rc1 is out and git reset my "next" branch to that.
3. Apply patches on top of the "next" branch. I never rebase or
do merges from Linus tree to the branch.
4. Once the merge window opens, goto 1.
[ Actually, I sometimes have multiple "next" topic branches if there's a risk
that I need to back out some of the changes from linux-next in the middle
of the merge cycle. ]
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists