[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLEX=LRQK+zo1m1SmizwziOyU_qOcbJ+hYOBb4Un+3FCUg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 16:04:40 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi>
To: Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
V9FS Developers <v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] 9p changes fro merge window
On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Pekka Enberg <penberg@...helsinki.fi> wrote:
> I don't know if mine is the preferred workflow but what I usually do is:
>
> 1. Send a pull request to Linus in a separate throw-away branch
> that's an exact copy of my "next" branch.
>
> 2. Wait until -rc1 is out and git reset my "next" branch to that.
>
> 3. Apply patches on top of the "next" branch. I never rebase or
> do merges from Linus tree to the branch.
>
> 4. Once the merge window opens, goto 1.
>
> [ Actually, I sometimes have multiple "next" topic branches if there's a risk
> that I need to back out some of the changes from linux-next in the middle
> of the merge cycle. ]
And oh, I usually set up a local 'testing' branch when the merge
window opens merge latest release and my 'next' branch to it. It's
mostly a sanity check before I send a pull request to Linus to check
that everything still works. I never publish this branch nor make it
part of the pull request to Linus.
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists