[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.00.1110261329240.23111@chino.kir.corp.google.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2011 13:30:07 -0700 (PDT)
From: David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>
To: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] checkpatch: improve error message for p1-check
On Wed, 19 Oct 2011, Wolfram Sang wrote:
> The old error message was not precise. State now explicitly that the
> prefix exists as a file/directory. Also change the conclusion ("appears
> to be") into an instruction ("make sure").
>
Why can't we suppress this warning unless both prefixes appear as files or
directories in the cwd? ('a' and 'b' if using git format-patch)
> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
> Acked-by: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>
> Cc: Andy Whitcroft <apw@...onical.com>
> ---
> scripts/checkpatch.pl | 2 +-
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/scripts/checkpatch.pl b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> index 3dfc471..4bb4f88 100755
> --- a/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> +++ b/scripts/checkpatch.pl
> @@ -1506,7 +1506,7 @@ sub process {
> if (!$file && $tree && $p1_prefix ne '' &&
> -e "$root/$p1_prefix") {
> WARN("PATCH_PREFIX",
> - "patch prefix '$p1_prefix' exists, appears to be a -p0 patch\n");
> + "patch prefix '$p1_prefix' exists as file/directory. Make sure this isn't a -p0 patch\n");
> }
>
> if ($realfile =~ m@...clude/asm/@) {
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists