[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOJsxLGOTw7rtFnqeHvzFxifA0QgPVDHZzrEo=-uB2Gkrvp=JQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 17:26:24 +0300
From: Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
To: Cyclonus J <cyclonusj@...il.com>
Cc: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, ngupta@...are.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, JBeulich@...ell.com,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mm: frontswap (for 3.2 window)
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 10:30 AM, Cyclonus J <cyclonusj@...il.com> wrote:
>> I felt it would be difficult to try and merge any tmem KVM patches until
>> both frontswap and cleancache are in the kernel, thats why the
>> development is currently paused at the POC level.
>
> Same here. I am working a KVM support for Transcedent Memory as well.
> It would be nice to see this in the mainline.
We don't really merge code for future projects - especially when it
touches the core kernel.
As for the frontswap patches, there's pretty no ACKs from MM people
apart from one Reviewed-by from Andrew. I really don't see why the
pull request is sent directly to Linus...
Pekka
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists