[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOzbF4fnD=CGR-nizZoBxmFSuAjFC3uAHf3wDj5RLneJvJhrOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 00:30:10 -0700
From: Cyclonus J <cyclonusj@...il.com>
To: Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, ngupta@...are.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, JBeulich@...ell.com,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mm: frontswap (for 3.2 window)
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 12:12 AM, Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-10-27 at 17:52 -0400, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Thu, Oct 27, 2011 at 02:49:31PM -0700, Dan Magenheimer wrote:
>> > If Linux truly subscribes to the "code rules" mantra, no core
>> > VM developer has proposed anything -- even a design, let alone
>> > working code -- that comes close to providing the functionality
>> > and flexibility that frontswap (and cleancache) provides, and
>> > frontswap provides it with a very VERY small impact on existing
>> > kernel code AND has been posted and working for 2+ years.
>> > (And during that 2+ years, excellent feedback has improved the
>> > "kernel-ness" of the code, but NONE of the core frontswap
>> > design/hooks have changed... because frontswap _just works_!)
>>
>> It might work for whatever defintion of work, but you certainly couldn't
>> convince anyone that matters that it's actually sexy and we'd actually
>> need it. Only actually working on Xen of course doesn't help.
>
> Theres a working POC of it on KVM, mostly based on reusing in-kernel Xen
> code.
>
> I felt it would be difficult to try and merge any tmem KVM patches until
> both frontswap and cleancache are in the kernel, thats why the
> development is currently paused at the POC level.
Same here. I am working a KVM support for Transcedent Memory as well.
It would be nice to see this in the mainline.
Thanks,
CJ
>
> --
>
> Sasha.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists