[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111028073026.GB6268@barrios-laptop.redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:30:26 +0900
From: Minchan Kim <minchan.kim@...il.com>
To: Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@...el.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"aarcange@...hat.com" <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, mel <mel@....ul.ie>,
KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [patch 5/5]thp: split huge page if head page is isolated
On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 01:11:55PM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 07:34 +0800, Minchan Kim wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 10:59:40AM +0800, Shaohua Li wrote:
> > > With current logic, if page reclaim finds a huge page, it will just reclaim
> > > the head page and leave tail pages reclaimed later. Let's take an example,
> > > lru list has page A and B, page A is huge page:
> > > 1. page A is isolated
> > > 2. page B is isolated
> > > 3. shrink_page_list() adds page A to swap page cache. so page A is split.
> > > page A+1, page A+2, ... are added to lru list.
> > > 4. shrink_page_list() adds page B to swap page cache.
> > > 5. page A and B is written out and reclaimed.
> > > 6. page A+1, A+2 ... is isolated and reclaimed later.
> > > So the reclaim order is A, B, ...(maybe other pages), A+1, A+2 ...
> >
> > I don't see your code yet but have a question.
> > You mitigate this problem by 4/5 which could add subpages into lru tail
> > so subpages would reclaim next interation of reclaim.
> >
> > What do we need 5/5?
> > Do I miss something?
> Both patches are required. without this patch, current page reclaim will
> only reclaim the first page of a huge page, because the hugepage isn't
> split yet. The hugepage is split when the first page is being written to
> swap, which is too later and page reclaim might already isolated a lot
> of pages.
When split happens, subpages would be located in tail of LRU by your 4/5.
(Assume tail of LRU is old age).
In addtion, isolation happens 32 page chunk so the subpages would be isolated
and reclaimed in next iteration. I think 32 pages are not too many.
What do you think about it?
--
Kind regards,
Minchan Kim
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists