linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111029063409.GB2207@suse.de>
Date:	Sat, 29 Oct 2011 08:34:09 +0200
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
Cc:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging

On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:28:11PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > The guest cannot survive a malicious host; so I think it is safe to say that the
> > > guest can assume the host is following the protocol.
> > 
> > That's not good for a very large number of reasons, not the least being
> > that we have no idea how secure the hyperv hypervisor is, so making it
> > so that there isn't an obvious hole into linux through it, would be a
> > good idea.
> > 
> > And yes, I'd say the same thing if this was a KVM or Xen driver as well.
> > Please be very defensive in this area of the code, especially as there
> > are no performance issues here.
> 
> In the chain of trust, the hypervisor and the host are the foundations
> as far as the guest is concerned, since both the hypervisor and the host
> can affect the guest in ways that the guest has no obvious way to protect itself.

That's true.

> If the hypervisor/host have security holes, there is not much you can do in the guest
> to deal with it. 
> In this case, I can add checks but I am not sure how useful it is.

I would prefer to see them here, just to be safe, it can not hurt,
right?


greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/