linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Sat, 29 Oct 2011 14:09:55 +0000
From:	KY Srinivasan <kys@...rosoft.com>
To:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
CC:	Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"devel@...uxdriverproject.org" <devel@...uxdriverproject.org>,
	"virtualization@...ts.osdl.org" <virtualization@...ts.osdl.org>,
	"ohering@...e.com" <ohering@...e.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging



> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH [mailto:gregkh@...e.de]
> Sent: Saturday, October 29, 2011 2:34 AM
> To: KY Srinivasan
> Cc: Jiri Kosina; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; devel@...uxdriverproject.org;
> virtualization@...ts.osdl.org; ohering@...e.com; Dmitry Torokhov
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] Staging: hv: Move the mouse driver out of staging
> 
> On Fri, Oct 28, 2011 at 08:28:11PM +0000, KY Srinivasan wrote:
> > > > The guest cannot survive a malicious host; so I think it is safe to say that the
> > > > guest can assume the host is following the protocol.
> > >
> > > That's not good for a very large number of reasons, not the least being
> > > that we have no idea how secure the hyperv hypervisor is, so making it
> > > so that there isn't an obvious hole into linux through it, would be a
> > > good idea.
> > >
> > > And yes, I'd say the same thing if this was a KVM or Xen driver as well.
> > > Please be very defensive in this area of the code, especially as there
> > > are no performance issues here.
> >
> > In the chain of trust, the hypervisor and the host are the foundations
> > as far as the guest is concerned, since both the hypervisor and the host
> > can affect the guest in ways that the guest has no obvious way to protect itself.
> 
> That's true.
> 
> > If the hypervisor/host have security holes, there is not much you can do in the
> guest
> > to deal with it.
> > In this case, I can add checks but I am not sure how useful it is.
> 
> I would prefer to see them here, just to be safe, it can not hurt,
> right?

I have added a check in the patches I sent out yesterday.

Regards,

K. Y
> 
> 
> greg k-h

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/