[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EAEC345.90704@tilera.com>
Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2011 11:48:21 -0400
From: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 8/8] tile: implement syscall restart generically
On 10/23/2011 6:20 AM, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> Manipulating task state to effect re-execution of an interrupted syscall
> used to be purely architecture specific code. However, as most arch's
> were essentially just making minor adjustments to almost identical logic,
> this code could be moved to a common implementation.
>
> The generic variant introduces the function handle_syscall_restart() to be
> called after get_signal_to_deliver(). The architecture specific register
> manipulations required to effect the actual restart are now implemented
> in the generic syscall interface found in asm/syscall.h
>
> This patch transitions this architecture's signal handling code over to
> using the generic syscall restart code by:
>
> i) Implementing the register manipulations in asm/syscall.h
> ii) Replacing the restart logic with a call to handle_syscall_restart
>
> Cc: Chris Metcalf <cmetcalf@...era.com>
> Signed-off-by: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
I like the idea, though the patch isn't quite right:
- You need to move the definition of INT_SWINT_1_SIGRETURN from
<asm/sigframe.h> to <asm/syscall.h>. You then have to add #includes of
<asm/syscall.h> to signal.c and stack.c in arch/tile/kernel. (And probably
use syscall_clear() in signal.c.)
- In syscall_do_restartblock() you need to use regs->regs[], not regs->gprs[].
--
Chris Metcalf, Tilera Corp.
http://www.tilera.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists