[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111104093222.GA1633@linux-mips.org>
Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 09:32:22 +0000
From: Ralf Baechle <ralf@...ux-mips.org>
To: Jonas Bonn <jonas@...thpole.se>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...ux-mips.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 4/8] mips: implement syscall restart generically
On Sun, Oct 23, 2011 at 12:19:58PM +0200, Jonas Bonn wrote:
> Manipulating task state to effect re-execution of an interrupted syscall
> used to be purely architecture specific code. However, as most arch's
> were essentially just making minor adjustments to almost identical logic,
> this code could be moved to a common implementation.
>
> The generic variant introduces the function handle_syscall_restart() to be
> called after get_signal_to_deliver(). The architecture specific register
> manipulations required to effect the actual restart are now implemented
> in the generic syscall interface found in asm/syscall.h
>
> This patch transitions this architecture's signal handling code over to
> using the generic syscall restart code by:
>
> i) Implementing the register manipulations in asm/syscall.h
> ii) Replacing the restart logic with a call to handle_syscall_restart
Nice cleanup.
Any reason why you add empty version of syscall_get_arguments and
syscall_set_version? A non-functional version that causes a silent
failure is way worse than something that fails at compile time.
Ralf
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists