[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CADZ9YHgR=WHzCfJf7_T_WjHJJHzOnWZsM2bWSACwLHEcHy+h-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 00:16:40 +0600
From: Rakib Mullick <rakib.mullick@...il.com>
To: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] nfs: Fix unused variable warning.
On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 11:43 PM, Trond Myklebust
<Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-10-31 at 23:12 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
>> On Mon, Oct 31, 2011 at 9:18 PM, Trond Myklebust
>> <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com> wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-10-28 at 16:36 +0600, Rakib Mullick wrote:
>> + data->inode->nfs_client->cl_hostname,
> ^^^^^^^^^^^^
> NFS_SERVER(data->inode)->nfs_client....
Opss. Sorry, should've more careful, rather doing it quickly :(.
data->inode has nothing inside named nfs_client, but didn't even
complain. I'll resend it.
Anyway, I found the two following warning in nfs/file.c
fs/nfs/file.c: In function ‘nfs_file_release’:
fs/nfs/file.c:140:17: warning: unused variable ‘dentry’
fs/nfs/file.c: In function ‘nfs_file_read’:
fs/nfs/file.c:237:9: warning: unused variable ‘count’
I'm wanting to send one patch to cleanup all these unused variable
issues. Shall I? Or, should I send separate patches?
Thanks,
Rakib
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists