[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111101180601.GV18855@google.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 11:06:01 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, trond.myklebust@...app.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] freezer: revert 27920651fe "PM / Freezer: Make
fake_signal_wake_up() wake TASK_KILLABLE tasks too"
On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 06:59:53PM +0100, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > #define wait_event_freezekillable(wq, condition) \
> > do { \
> > DEFINE_WAIT(__wait); \
> > for (;;) { \
> > prepare_to_wait(&wq, &__wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE); \
> > if (condition || fatal_signal_pending(current)) \
> > break; \
> > schedule(); \
>
> No, this can't work, afaics.
>
> Once the caller recieves a non-fatal signal (gets TIF_SIGPENDING),
> schedule() won't block in TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE state.
>
> IOW, wait_event_freezekillable() becomes a busy-wait loop.
Yeah yeah, Trond already pointed it out. I forgot about the
sigpending special case in schedule(), which I think is rather odd, oh
well. Any better ideas?
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists