[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111101181329.GA6739@redhat.com>
Date: Tue, 1 Nov 2011 19:13:29 +0100
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-pm@...r.kernel.org, linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org,
"J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@...ldses.org>,
Neil Brown <neilb@...e.de>, trond.myklebust@...app.com,
linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] freezer: revert 27920651fe "PM / Freezer: Make
fake_signal_wake_up() wake TASK_KILLABLE tasks too"
On 11/01, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
> Yeah yeah, Trond already pointed it out. I forgot about the
> sigpending special case in schedule(), which I think is rather odd,
I disagree with "rather odd" ;)
We have a lot of examples of
current->state = TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE;
...
if (signal_pending())
break;
schedule();
Without that special case in schedule() the code above becomes racy.
Just consider __wait_event_interruptible().
> Any better ideas?
Well. As a simple (probably temporary) fix, I'd suggest
#define wait_event_freezekillable(wq, condition)
{
freezer_do_not_count();
__retval = wait_event_killable(condition);
freezer_count();
__retval;
}
Do you think it can work?
Oleg.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists