[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAGXxSxUqzu8gBHU3GeCj1zmYdQdbC68dqaE1PeiBaOssPobo-g@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:27:25 +0800
From: Chen Jie <chenj@...ote.com>
To: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>,
David Daney <ddaney.cavm@...il.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH] clocksource: Avoid selecting mult values that might
overflow when adjusted
Hi,
We've backported the patch to our kernel, and redo the test[1] that
formerly caused system stall.
After 12-hours, no system stall observed.
Regards,
Chen Jie
----
[1] The test is just do "sleep 5 && reboot " on our mips64 compatible
CPU@...MHz. At each boot time, BIOS will calculate CPU Freq. Some CPU
Freq(around 500MHz) caused easy-overflow clock mult values in the
former tests, which then led to "sleep 5" never return.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists