linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bjdooks-i2c tree with Linus' tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111102022850.GA5875@zhy>
Date:	Wed, 2 Nov 2011 10:28:50 +0800
From:	Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the bjdooks-i2c tree with Linus' tree

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 12:22:21PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi Ben,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the bjdooks-i2c tree got a conflict in
> drivers/i2c/busses/i2c-designware-platdrv.c between commit 4311051c358a
> ("i2c: irq: Remove IRQF_DISABLED") from Linus' tree and commit
> f8420b7bf6ce ("fixup merge") from the bjdooks-i2c tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (by removing the IRQF_DISABLED flag) but this change should
> probably be sent to Linus as it appears to have been fixed up incorrectly
> there.

Yeah, we should remove that flag. And that is what commit 4311051c358a
want to achieve.

Thanks,
Yong

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/