[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAG88wWaZZj8k4KmgHdtYUiWQRcVTOaBDS0ik3bqj+VXzm5SQjQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2011 16:02:24 -0700
From: David Decotigny <david.decotigny@...gle.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>,
Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] param: make /sys/module/*/paramaters optional
Thank you all for your feedback.
FYI, this patch was meant to be an answer to a negative feedback I
received when I proposed changing a few module_param(... perm=S_IRUGO)
in forcedeth driver. But I agree the "price to pay" is very low.
Should I drop this patch?
--
David Decotigny
On Tue, Nov 1, 2011 at 5:24 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de> wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 04:50:35PM -0700, David Decotigny wrote:
>> From: David Decotigny <decot@...gle.com>
>>
>> With this patch, we allow systems that don't want to pay the price for
>> /sys/module/*/paramaters to be compiled without that feature.
>
> The "price"? What kind of price is it? How much memory is really saved
> here?
>
> greg k-h
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists