linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] param: make /sys/module/*/paramaters optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111103012929.GA3449@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 2 Nov 2011 18:29:29 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>
To:	David Decotigny <david.decotigny@...gle.com>
Cc:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	kgdb-bugreport@...ts.sourceforge.net,
	Michal Schmidt <mschmidt@...hat.com>,
	Richard Kennedy <richard@....demon.co.uk>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...are.com>,
	Kay Sievers <kay.sievers@...y.org>,
	Lucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@...fusion.mobi>,
	Satoru Moriya <satoru.moriya@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] param: make /sys/module/*/paramaters optional

On Wed, Nov 02, 2011 at 04:02:24PM -0700, David Decotigny wrote:
> Thank you all for your feedback.
> 
> FYI, this patch was meant to be an answer to a negative feedback I
> received when I proposed changing a few module_param(... perm=S_IRUGO)
> in forcedeth driver. But I agree the "price to pay" is very low.

Who gave you complaints about that?  Really?

> Should I drop this patch?

Please do.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/