linux-kernel - Re: [GIT PULL] UML changes for 3.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1320358228.14409.279.camel@x61.thuisdomein>
Date:	Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:10:28 +0100
From:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To:	Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Peter Foley <pefoley2@...izon.net>,
	Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UML changes for 3.2

On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 22:56 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
> These Makefiles always make me nervous. Is SUBARCH set by the time the
> update-po-config target is run? If so, we could simply do "env SUBARCH=
> $(SUBARCH) [...]". But how do I check that SUBARCH really is set (ie,
> that I'm not passing env an empty string)?

It seems the trick here should be
    env SUBARCH=$(KBUILD_BUILDHOST) [...]

Michal, does that make sense?


Paul Bolle

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/