[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB3134E.8080102@nod.at>
Date: Thu, 03 Nov 2011 23:18:54 +0100
From: Richard Weinberger <richard@....at>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Foley <pefoley2@...izon.net>,
Michal Marek <mmarek@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] UML changes for 3.2
Am 03.11.2011 23:10, schrieb Paul Bolle:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 22:56 +0100, Paul Bolle wrote:
>> These Makefiles always make me nervous. Is SUBARCH set by the time the
>> update-po-config target is run? If so, we could simply do "env SUBARCH=
>> $(SUBARCH) [...]". But how do I check that SUBARCH really is set (ie,
>> that I'm not passing env an empty string)?
>
> It seems the trick here should be
> env SUBARCH=$(KBUILD_BUILDHOST) [...]
>
> Michal, does that make sense?
>
Beware, it's also possible to set it by hand.
E.g. for building a i386 UML on x86_64.
make linux ARCH=um SUBARCH=i386.
As long no inclusion of another Kconfig file depends on SUBARCH, setting
it to the empty string is ok.
Thanks,
//richard
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (491 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists