[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1320420256.3079.172.camel@deadeye>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 15:24:16 +0000
From: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>, Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>,
Jens Axboe <jaxboe@...ionio.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk
Subject: Re: [050/107] block: check for proper length of iov entries earlier
in blk_rq_map_user_iov()
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 15:14 -0700, Greg KH wrote:
> 2.6.32-longterm review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let us know.
>
> ------------------
>
> From: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@...hat.com>
>
> commit 5478755616ae2ef1ce144dded589b62b2a50d575 upstream.
>
> commit 9284bcf checks for proper length of iov entries in
> blk_rq_map_user_iov(). But if the map is unaligned, kernel
> will break out the loop without checking for the proper length.
> So we need to check the proper length before the unalign check.
This will catch an unaligned zero-length entry. But there's still no
check for zero-length iov entries *after* the unaligned entry.
[...]
> --- a/block/blk-map.c
> +++ b/block/blk-map.c
> @@ -201,12 +201,13 @@ int blk_rq_map_user_iov(struct request_q
> for (i = 0; i < iov_count; i++) {
> unsigned long uaddr = (unsigned long)iov[i].iov_base;
>
> + if (!iov[i].iov_len)
> + return -EINVAL;
> +
> if (uaddr & queue_dma_alignment(q)) {
> unaligned = 1;
> break;
I think the correct fix is just to remove the 'break'.
Ben.
> }
> - if (!iov[i].iov_len)
> - return -EINVAL;
> }
>
> if (unaligned || (q->dma_pad_mask & len) || map_data)
>
--
Ben Hutchings
Sturgeon's Law: Ninety percent of everything is crap.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (829 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists