[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EB403C0.9030503@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2011 10:24:48 -0500
From: David Smith <dsmith@...hat.com>
To: Pedro Alves <pedro@...esourcery.com>
CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2] Tracepoint: add exec tracepoint
On 11/04/2011 07:08 AM, Pedro Alves wrote:
> On Thursday 03 November 2011 15:59:48, David Smith wrote:
>> + if (depth == 0) {
>> + trace_sched_process_exec(current, bprm);
>> ptrace_event(PTRACE_EVENT_EXEC,
>> old_pid);
>> + }
>
> Won't tracepoints be interested in the old pid as well? Or does bprm
> carry that info? That was only recently added to the ptrace event,
> which probably postdates your original patch.
Looking back at commit bb188d7 and the reasons why 'old_pid' was added,
it seems like a good idea to go ahead and add 'old_pid' to the
tracepoint as well.
v3 coming up...
Thanks for looking at this.
--
David Smith
dsmith@...hat.com
Red Hat
http://www.redhat.com
256.217.0141 (direct)
256.837.0057 (fax)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists