linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH 2/2] regulator:TPS65910: VDD1/2 voltage selector count

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <C8443D0743D26F4388EA172BF4E2A7A9019650@DBDE01.ent.ti.com>
Date:	Fri, 4 Nov 2011 16:32:43 +0000
From:	"Mohammed, Afzal" <afzal@...com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
CC:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Girdwood, Liam" <lrg@...com>,
	"sameo@...ux.intel.com" <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Nori, Sekhar" <nsekhar@...com>,
	"linux-omap@...r.kernel.org" <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	"gg@...mlogic.co.uk" <gg@...mlogic.co.uk>,
	Jorge Eduardo Candelaria <jedu@...mlogic.co.uk>
Subject: RE: [PATCH 2/2] regulator:TPS65910: VDD1/2 voltage selector count

Hi Mark,

On Fri, Nov 04, 2011 at 21:48:56, Mark Brown wrote:
> So that definitely seems wrong then - n_voltages is supposed to be the
> number of voltages that can be selected so if the regulator supports
> _NUM_VOLTS steps then I'd expect to see that constant used directly.
> Otherwise I'd suggest that the magic number needs a #define.
> 

A gain of 0x1, 0x2, 0x3 is possible for each of the voltage steps,
so we have a total of _NUM_VOLTS * 3 steps (although some of them
would be same values).

Let me know your opinion on using _NUM_VOLTS * NUM_GAIN instead,
with #define NUM_GAIN 3.

Regards
Afzal
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/