[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <201529.1320618774@turing-police.cc.vt.edu>
Date: Sun, 06 Nov 2011 17:32:54 -0500
From: Valdis.Kletnieks@...edu
To: John Stoffel <john@...ffel.org>
Cc: Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@...cle.com>,
Johannes Weiner <jweiner@...hat.com>,
Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>,
Cyclonus J <cyclonusj@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-mm@...ck.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Konrad Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>,
Seth Jennings <sjenning@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>, ngupta@...are.org,
Chris Mason <chris.mason@...cle.com>, JBeulich@...ell.com,
Dave Hansen <dave@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] mm: frontswap (for 3.2 window)
On Fri, 28 Oct 2011 16:52:28 EDT, John Stoffel said:
> Dan> "WHY" this is such a good idea is the same as WHY it is useful to
> Dan> add RAM to your systems.
>
> So why would I use this instead of increasing the physical RAM?
You're welcome to buy me a new laptop that has a third DIMM slot. :)
There's a lot of people running hardware that already has the max amount of
supported RAM, and who for budget or legacy-support reasons can't easily do a
forklift upgrade to a new machine.
> if I've got a large system which cannot physically use any more
> memory, then it might be worth my while to use TMEM to get more
> performance out of this expensive hardware.
It's not always a large system....
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists