[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1320739015.2244.0.camel@twins>
Date: Tue, 08 Nov 2011 08:56:55 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
To: Yong Zhang <yong.zhang0@...il.com>
Cc: Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com,
bp@...en8.de, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
casteyde.christian@...e.fr
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] lockdep: lock_set_subclass() fix
On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 10:58 +0800, Yong Zhang wrote:
> > struct lockdep_map {
> > + const char *name;
> > struct lock_class_key *key;
> > struct lock_class *class_cache[NR_LOCKDEP_CACHING_CLASSES];
> > - const char *name;
> > #ifdef CONFIG_LOCK_STAT
> > int cpu;
> > unsigned long ip;
> > diff --git a/kernel/lockdep.c b/kernel/lockdep.c
> > index e69434b..81855cf 100644
> > --- a/kernel/lockdep.c
> > +++ b/kernel/lockdep.c
> > @@ -2948,7 +2948,8 @@ static int mark_lock(struct task_struct *curr, struct held_lock *this,
> > void lockdep_init_map(struct lockdep_map *lock, const char *name,
> > struct lock_class_key *key, int subclass)
> > {
> > - memset(lock, 0, sizeof(*lock));
> > + kmemcheck_mark_initialized(lock, 2*sizeof(void *));
> > + memset(&lock->class_cache[0], 0, sizeof(*lock)-2*sizeof(void *));
>
> That means ->key have chance to be 0 at some time, right?
How? We only memset from class_cache onwards, leaving name and key
untouched.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists