[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111109085234.GC2531@xps8300>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 10:52:34 +0200
From: Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Cc: "ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 01/19] usb: otg: Rename otg_transceiver to usb_phy
Hi,
On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:04:43PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:28:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but sounds like you are still marrying
> > > OTG with transceivers.
> > I'm against the idea of usb_phy married with the transceiver (i.e
> > transceiver = twl6030 for instance)
>
> I think the source of confusion is the split phy functionality on OMAPs.
> twl6030 basically provides VBUS/ID comparators which communicate VBUS/ID
> levels to internal PHY via a well-defined mailbox. We need a
> good way to write that down in source code.
OK, I think I understand now. So this issue is not in the scope of
these patches, right?
Br,
--
heikki
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists