linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv6 01/19] usb: otg: Rename otg_transceiver to usb

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111109104359.GB16165@legolas.emea.dhcp.ti.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Nov 2011 12:44:00 +0200
From:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To:	Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
	"ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY" <kishon@...com>, Greg KH <gregkh@...e.de>,
	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 01/19] usb: otg: Rename otg_transceiver to usb_phy

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 10:52:34AM +0200, Heikki Krogerus wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 05:04:43PM +0200, Felipe Balbi wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 08, 2011 at 08:28:15PM +0530, ABRAHAM, KISHON VIJAY wrote:
> > > > Maybe I'm misunderstanding you, but sounds like you are still marrying
> > > > OTG with transceivers.
> > > I'm against the idea of usb_phy married with the transceiver (i.e
> > > transceiver = twl6030 for instance)
> > 
> > I think the source of confusion is the split phy functionality on OMAPs.
> > twl6030 basically provides VBUS/ID comparators which communicate VBUS/ID
> > levels to internal PHY via a well-defined mailbox. We need a
> > good way to write that down in source code.
> 
> OK, I think I understand now. So this issue is not in the scope of
> these patches, right?

probably not, still worth keeping it in mind ;-)

-- 
balbi

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)