linux-kernel - Re: [Patch 5/11] Regulator: DA9052/53 regulator support v5

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20111109140647.GA587@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
Date:	Wed, 9 Nov 2011 14:06:47 +0000
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nsource.wolfsonmicro.com>
To:	"Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu)" <paul.liu@...aro.org>
Cc:	ashish.jangam@...tcummins.com, linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org,
	lrg@...mlogic.co.uk, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Dajun <dajun.chen@...semi.com>
Subject: Re: [Patch 5/11] Regulator: DA9052/53 regulator support v5

On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 08:42:44PM +0800, Ying-Chun Liu (PaulLiu) wrote:

> Hi Mark,

> I've already tested this driver (v5) with the DA9052 MFD v8 driver
> posted on 20111103. It is tested on my imx53 Quickstart board. This
> patch also looks good to me. Please review this driver if possible.

Please resubmit if you want it reviewed, to reiterate the problems with
the core driver meant I didn't see much value in reviewing the code.  I
can't review the code if I don't have a copy.  I'm also note sure why
you're asking me alone to review the code?

If Linaro wants to help get this stuff upstream I strongly suggest you
help the guys with the process issues that have been (for example we've
still not seen an actual patch series submitted).  Possibly taking over
the actual patch submissions would be helpful.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/