[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdZqdgSc6FCoLT8iwzVVYuFw_t8bF=a2hCZFQCLw5zwqkQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 15:11:37 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...ricsson.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Barry Song <21cnbao@...il.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...escale.com>,
Linaro Dev <linaro-dev@...ts.linaro.org>,
Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: hide subsystem from the populace
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 5:23 PM, Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com> wrote:
> Linus Walleij wrote at Monday, November 07, 2011 7:15 AM:
>> if PINCTRL
>>
>> +menu "Pin controllers"
>> + depends on PINCTRL
>> +
>> config PINMUX
>> bool "Support pinmux controllers"
>> help
>
> But shouldn't PINMUX and PINMUX_${soc} also have their help text removed;
> it seems like if a SoC selects PINCTRL, it would also select PINMUX if
> appropriate, and the relevant PINMUX_${soc} too?
Yep, you're absolutely right, let's cut the crap.
> I assume there are also patches for arch/arm/mach-${foo}/Kconfig somewhere
> to select PINCTRL when appropriate; they didn't show up in my inbox, but
> I haven't checked my sub-folders yet, so perhaps they're already there.
The U300 one is already in arch/arm/mach-u300/Kconfig
The SirfPrimaII will be part of that platform (still out-of-tree).
They have to start somewhere ... those guys need pinmux to even
get the UART working.
Thanks,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists