[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111109144922.GC8410@phenom.dumpdata.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 09:49:22 -0500
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
To: Paul Durrant <Paul.Durrant@...rix.com>
Cc: "annie.li@...cle.com" <annie.li@...cle.com>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"jeremy@...p.org" <jeremy@...p.org>,
"kurt.hackel@...cle.com" <kurt.hackel@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] Introducing grant table V2 stucture
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 11:11:22AM +0000, Paul Durrant wrote:
> Annie,
>
> Comments inline below...
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> [snip]
> > -static struct grant_entry *shared;
> > +static union {
> > + struct grant_entry_v1 *v1;
> > + void *ring_addr;
> > +} shared;
> > +
>
> 'ring_addr' seems like the wrong name here; how about 'raw'?
Or 'ring'. I asked Annie to change it from 'raw' to something else and the first
thing that came in my mind was 'ring_addr'. But this does not point to a ring, so
the 'ring' part is wrong.
Point here is to make it descriptive. 'raw' does not carry meaning of _what_
it is suppose to do.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists