[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EBA26D9.3050108@snapgear.com>
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2011 17:08:09 +1000
From: Greg Ungerer <gerg@...pgear.com>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
CC: <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the m68knommu tree with the m68k
tree
Hi Stephen,
On 11/09/2011 10:15 AM, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Today's linux-next merge of the m68knommu tree got a conflict in
> arch/m68k/Kconfig between commit d890d7399525 ("m68k/irq: Remove obsolete
> m68k irq framework") from the m68k tree and commit 4e8a9e70dfe8 ("m68k:
> selection of GENERIC_ATOMIC64 is not MMU specific") from the m68knommu
> tree.
>
> Just context changes. I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as
> necessary.
Thanks. Both this and the previous m68k merge conflict patch look good.
Geert: would you prefer I hold off on these 2 patches until after
you merge your IRQ changes?
Regards
Greg
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Greg Ungerer -- Principal Engineer EMAIL: gerg@...pgear.com
SnapGear Group, McAfee PHONE: +61 7 3435 2888
8 Gardner Close, FAX: +61 7 3891 3630
Milton, QLD, 4064, Australia WEB: http://www.SnapGear.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists