[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111110115712.GA6492@localhost>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:57:12 +0800
From: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@...el.com>
To: Nick Bowler <nbowler@...iptictech.com>
Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"alsa-devel@...a-project.org" <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
Keith Packard <keithp@...thp.com>,
"dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org" <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.2-rc1
Hi Nick,
On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 03:40:19PM +0800, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Tue, 8 Nov 2011 12:23:30 -0800,
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> >
> > Hmm, I don't know what caused this to trigger, but I'm adding both the
> > i915 people and the HDA people to the cc, and they can fight to the
> > death about this in the HDMI Thunderdome.
>
> It must be the new addition of ELD-passing code.
>
> Fengguang, can the drm or i915 driver check whether ELD is changed or
> not? Writing ELD at each time even when unchanged confuses the audio
> side, as if the monitor is hotplugged.
The attached patch is tested OK to prevent extra hot plug events.
However it has one side effect: when HDMI monitor is hot removed,
the ELD keeps remain valid. I need to find a way to test for the
presence of the monitor and handle that case as well. When all done,
I'll submit the patches together for review.
Thanks,
Fengguang
View attachment "no-extra-eld-passing" of type "text/plain" (2662 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists