linux-kernel - Re: Linux 3.2-rc1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4ECAFDAD.5040801@panasas.com>
Date:	Mon, 21 Nov 2011 17:41:01 -0800
From:	Boaz Harrosh <bharrosh@...asas.com>
To:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...il.com>
CC:	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Linux 3.2-rc1

On 11/09/2011 09:28 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> 
> Fedora uses those.  We also used the -gitX snapshot patches when they
> were generated, but now we do that by hand (which we also did for the
> -rcX patches while kernel.org was down.)
> 
> josh

My god that totally-brain-dead Fedora Kernel rpm generation.

RANT a head should be skipped!!

I wish there was a strait forward way to point to a Kernel
git tree HEAD and say "make rpm", which is simply the tar
of the "make modules_install" and the "make install" output
+ a simple script to manipulate grub.conf

Not today's Fedora-Kernel git tree which is not a Linux
git tree at all but those patches above + stable.
Any simple tree moments needs to involve black patch magic
and fear of hell. (Don't try this at home)

Actually the "grub-selector" should have been it's own
rpm. And each Kernel can/should be it's own independent
(none conflicting, right) package. I know, I know, it tries
to be that, but it is not. For example I want a low-latency
rt Kernel as a side choice for any Kernel, and so on...

Throw away that monstrous  Fedora-Kernel-tree. There is
only one Kernel tree it is called Linux. You can do your
own back/forward port branches based on stable to your
heart's content with out inventing a new totally different
patches tree.

Someone stop me. There is no end to the RANT I can
generate about Fedora Kernel release

Boaz
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/