[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111110152606.GB3207@oksana.dev.rtsoft.ru>
Date: Thu, 10 Nov 2011 19:26:06 +0400
From: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@...hat.com>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...otime.net>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-ide@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
Alan Cox <alan@...rguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 2/2] ata: Don't use NO_IRQ in pata_of_platform driver
Drivers should not use NO_IRQ; moreover, some architectures don't
have it nowadays. '0' is the 'no irq' case.
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <cbouatmailru@...il.com>
---
drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c | 7 +------
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
index f99e17b..2a472c5 100644
--- a/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
+++ b/drivers/ata/pata_of_platform.c
@@ -16,11 +16,6 @@
#include <linux/of_platform.h>
#include <linux/ata_platform.h>
-/* For archs that don't support NO_IRQ (such as x86), provide a dummy value */
-#ifndef NO_IRQ
-#define NO_IRQ 0
-#endif
-
static int __devinit pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
{
int ret;
@@ -57,7 +52,7 @@ static int __devinit pata_of_platform_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
}
ret = of_irq_to_resource(dn, 0, &irq_res);
- if (ret == NO_IRQ)
+ if (!ret)
irq_res.start = irq_res.end = 0;
else
irq_res.flags = 0;
--
1.7.5.3
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists