linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-spec: flexible configuration layout

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EBFCF13.9090605@redhat.com>
Date:	Sun, 13 Nov 2011 16:07:15 +0200
From:	Ronen Hod <rhod@...hat.com>
To:	"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
CC:	Sasha Levin <levinsasha928@...il.com>, Avi Kivity <avi@...hat.com>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
	lkml - Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Alexey Kardashevskiy <aik@...abs.ru>,
	Amit Shah <amit.shah@...hat.com>,
	Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
	Krishna Kumar <krkumar2@...ibm.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Wang Sheng-Hui <shhuiw@...il.com>,
	virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC] virtio-spec: flexible configuration layout

On 11/09/2011 05:19 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 09, 2011 at 02:48:58PM +0200, Sasha Levin wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 14:38 +0200, Avi Kivity wrote:
>>> On 11/09/2011 10:46 AM, Sasha Levin wrote:
>>>>> Alternatively we can add new structures with new
>>>>> structure IDs, pointed to from PCI configuration space.
>>>>>
>>>>> As we don't yet have devices or drivers with 64 bit features,
>>>>> I decided we don't need high feature bits in legacy space.
>>>>> This also frees up feature bit 31 as we don't need it
>>>>> to enable high feature bits anymore.
>>>> KVM tool actually has support for 64bit features, we can probably remove
>>>> that when Pekka isn't looking :)
>>>>
>>> What about the Windows drivers?
>> While 64-bit features were defined, there was no actual devices to use
>> them.
>>
>> So even if Windows drivers had the ability to support 64-bit features,
>> no device ever needed it therefore no device ever activated it.
>>
>> A potential issue might arise when we remap feature bit 31 to do
>> something else, and when activated it would fool Windows drivers to
>> think that 64-bit features are now activated, while they're not - but
>> thats not something that should happen since legacy layout shouldn't
>> have that field enabled as per the spec (no new features in legacy
>> code).
>>
>> I was unable to check if it was actually implemented in the drivers
>> because
>> http://git.kernel.org/?p=virt/kvm/kvm-guest-drivers-windows.git;a=summary is not quite there (*cough*).

https://github.com/YanVugenfirer/kvm-guest-drivers-windows

> I'm pretty sure windows drivers didn't yet get to it.
> This was out for a very short time.
>
>> -- 
>>
>> Sasha.
>>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/