[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4EC371FE.5010402@solonet.org.ua>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:19:10 +0200
From: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>
CC: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>,
Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: add flags to export GPIOs when requesting
Hi Stephen,
On 11/16/2011 01:32 AM, Stephen Warren wrote:
> Denis Kuzmenko wrote at Tuesday, November 15, 2011 4:05 PM:
>> Hi Wolfram,
>> On 11/16/2011 12:44 AM, Wolfram Sang wrote:
>>
>> #define GPIOF_EXPORT (1 << 2)
>> #define GPIOF_EXPORT_DIR_CHANGEABLE (3 << 2)
>
> Then you won't have a single flag to check if the dir is changeable.
>
> Personally, I'd go for the two single-bit flags, and force boards to OR
> them together if they want the GPIO exported and with a changeable
> direction; just get rid of the two _DIR_ flags. That said, Wolfram's
> patch seems to follow the conventions already in the file.
Your truth.
> Dong Aisheng posted patch "gpio: introduce gpio_export_array to ease
> export for gpio arrays". Which should we pick; it doesn't seem like we
> need both mechanisms.
I vote for GPIOF_* variant (this one) since it can deal with different
settings for each gpio pin in array.
--
Best regards, Denis Kuzmenko.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists