[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20111116091027.GB2596@pengutronix.de>
Date: Wed, 16 Nov 2011 10:10:27 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <w.sang@...gutronix.de>
To: Denis Kuzmenko <linux@...onet.org.ua>
Cc: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dia.com>,
Dong Aisheng <dong.aisheng@...aro.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gpio: add flags to export GPIOs when requesting
Hi,
> >> #define GPIOF_EXPORT (1 << 2)
> >> #define GPIOF_EXPORT_DIR_CHANGEABLE (3 << 2)
> >
> > Then you won't have a single flag to check if the dir is changeable.
I played with both versions you mentioned and came to like this one
better, for this reason...
> > direction; just get rid of the two _DIR_ flags. That said, Wolfram's
> > patch seems to follow the conventions already in the file.
>
> Your truth.
...and this reason :)
> > Dong Aisheng posted patch "gpio: introduce gpio_export_array to ease
> > export for gpio arrays". Which should we pick; it doesn't seem like we
> > need both mechanisms.
>
> I vote for GPIOF_* variant (this one) since it can deal with different
> settings for each gpio pin in array.
Huh? I really missed Aisheng's one, otherwise I would have responded to
that. I also think my version is less intrusive and I surely need the
option that some pins may change directions and others may not.
BTW I didn't CC Grant, because he is on sabbatical right now, so Stephen
you are taking care of GPIO?
Thanks,
Wolfram
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Wolfram Sang |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (199 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists