linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] i2c/busses: (mpc) Add support for SMBUS_READ_BLOCK

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <4EC40778.5020208@freescale.com>
Date:	Wed, 16 Nov 2011 12:56:56 -0600
From:	Timur Tabi <timur@...escale.com>
To:	<guenter.roeck@...csson.com>
CC:	York Sun <yorksun@...escale.com>,
	Jean Delvare <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
	"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"B29983@...escale.com" <B29983@...escale.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] i2c/busses: (mpc) Add support for SMBUS_READ_BLOCK_DATA

Guenter Roeck wrote:
> I simply don't have time for this, and spent way too much time on it
> already. Jean, please drop this patch. If someone else needs it, he or
> she can revive and re-submit it. If folks can complain about the patch
> w/o understanding how SMBus block reads work, but are not willing to
> test it, something is wrong anyway.

I don't see York's posts as a complaint at all, just someone with a vested interest in this code trying to understand the patch.  I definitely appreciate the effort you have put into it already, and I'm disappointed that you think that this is now a waste of your time.

-- 
Timur Tabi
Linux kernel developer at Freescale

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/